Any textual artifact is a contingently configured field of potential, capable of producing a reading.To which I would like to add:
Every reading is a text.Of necessity.
But every reading is not the text being read.
And so for day 1022
30.09.2009
Any textual artifact is a contingently configured field of potential, capable of producing a reading.To which I would like to add:
Every reading is a text.Of necessity.
[...] to the long centerIn the same poem, one finds a subtle line: "only my breath has any answers" where the echo is present of "many" answers.
of the lake, the coldest point where only
deep breaths carry any chance
of touching bottom
if you want to know where to lookThere they are already in the poem. Compressed in the image. See them haul the water, heat it, pour it, let the tea steep, pour and then drink a cup.
for them, hoping to catch them by surprise
as they boil river water for their morning tea,
as they boil river water for their morning teaOf course, Giles Benaway in Ceremonies for the Dead would plunge us into the deep long centre but there is nothing necrotic in these necropoems; the bones have been picked clean, hollowed to whistle with: animated by every release of breath — they there infusing we here.
Your alphabet endswhich is then joined by a line appearing beneath
Where my alphabet beginsfollowed by an attribution to Dr. Seuss.
In the places I go there are things that I seeNow I see that it's a single line. But I like mine! Certainly inflected by the odd memory work from the split fade-in on the screen from Sons of Captain Poetry — there is the attentive to sound repetition in the "n" in "begins" and "ends" and the other reversals — this so-called Zed version is forward thinking.
That I never could spell if I stopped with the Z.
I'm telling you this 'cause you're one of my friends.
My alphabet starts where your alphabet ends!
Your alphabet endsI also probably have on the brain that collaboration between Jay MillAr and Stephen Cain, Double Helix, mischief for enlightened ears.
Where my alphabet begins
STRAWBERRIESAnd beyond this brief opening segment the poem goes on to remark about there being no need to slice one to reveal what is inside and concludes:
do not
hide their seeds
They scatter
into their own bodies
before
they find ground
There are no bonesDeserves to be visited in its book context along with the other poems in the collection to appreciate the spacing which results in words distributed in a controlled scatter effect spiralling down to page end and over.
to structure its shape,
no peel
through which to plunge
But then why resist intimacy, why seem to flee it? A powerful countercurrent pulls against our drive toward connection; we also desire individuation, separateness, freedom. On one side of the balance is the need for home, for the deep solid roots of place and belonging; on the other is the desire for travel and motion, for the single separate spark of the self freely moving forward, out into time, into the great absorbing stream of the world.The nest is a vessel. That's my answer. World and home are not always poised in opposition. Solidarity and singularity are not polar opposites. There is a different way of mapping... The urban cafe table is open to the coming and goings of patrons and yet is an oasis for the self. I think it more profitable to think in terms of calm and swirling. Intimacy itself is not always a calm, quiet experience. Its modes can be marked by the turbulence of sheer lust and the haste of sexual gratification. It's about speed and not so much about space. And it is about being attentive whatever the tempo may be working with or against the pulse of our flow.
A fierce internal debate, between staying moored and drifting away, between holding on and letting go. Perhaps wisdom lies in our ability to negotiate between these two poles. Necessary to us, both of them — but how to live in connection without feeling suffocated, compromised, erased? We long to connect; we fear that if we do, our freedom and individuality will disappear.
A still life is more like a poem than it is like a portrait. When you look at a representation of a human figure — a shepherd, a saint, a prince — that figure looks back at you; the painting is concerned with the experience of animation, with what will give soul to the figure before us. The end of our seeing is in the eyes of the figure that seems to see us, that looks back toward us, quizzical, alive, caught. It is at the eyes of a portrait, always, that our seeing stops.And before this fount of never ending pleasure we as readers were brought to meditate on transitoriness, in particular "the poems of the dead."
But in a still life, there is no end to our looking, which has become allied with the gaze of the painter; we look in and in, to the world of things, in their ambiance of cool or warm light, in and in, as long as we can stand to look, as long as we take pleasure in looking.
Where there was a person, a voice, a range and welter of experience compressed into lines and images, now there are only lines and images. Where there was a life, now there is a form.This is where the hinge happens between poem and still life. And so the act of looking is like the act of breathing.
And the form, spoken, breathes something of that life out into the world again. It restores a human presence; hidden in the lines, if they are good lines, is the writer's breath, are the turns of thought and of phrase, the habits of saying, which make those words unmistakable. and so the result is a permanent intimacy; we are brought into relations with the perceptual character, the speaking voice, of someone we probably never knew, someone no on can know now, except in this way.
a humanCaught looking. Caught dropping commas. Avoiding periods. Too close for intimacy.
presence
hidden
in the lines
if they are
good
lines
is the writer's
breath
are the turns
of thought
and
of phrase
the habits
of saying
which make
those words
unmistakable
and so
the result
is a
permanent
intimacy
Don Eastep took a sample spoonful from each of the 80 other competitors' chilis, mixed them up in a cup and offered that cup to the judges, who judged it the best.
I have a brass box for cigarettes andThere follows two couplets given over to shirts and their colours and more follow with descriptions of types of paper and coloured pencils. There is in the mix "two wallets but no money" which does not stop us — two wallets even without money is in keeping with the theme of abundance as the listing continues. And our poet comes full circle and we realize the penury when abundance of a different sort drips down
two pair of shoes and
and a pot to catch the ceiling's rain andNow I ask is this camp?
clay ashtrays and, and, and —
I have a brass box for cigarettes,
when I have cigarettes.
After 1951, when Duncan began his lifelong relationship with the artist Jess Collins, the "household" becomes a major theme in his work.It is the "house" itself that merits attention in a poem by Mark Doty. "Essay: The Love of Old Houses" upon meditating on the floorboards worn down by previous inhabitants proposes
here it's proved that time requiresMy history, his, yours, doubling back to the motions of water: all the while succession demonstrates that the notion of place is indebted to words, not merely to build the description but also to mark the possession and dispossession. And we by this conjunction of pronominal play and verb crafting are reminded of Robert Duncan's opening poem to The Opening of the Field which casts these concerns in the idiom of the repeatable. "Often I Am Permitted to Return to a Meadow" begins thus
a deeper, better verb than pass;
it's more like pool, and ebb, and double
back again, my history, his, yours,
as if it were a scene made-up by the mind,Duncan's poem given his concerns veers into Hermetic images. It concludes with a characterization of the place that could be attached to the old house that Doty conjures. Duncan's meadow "is a place of first permission, / everlasting omen of what is." These are two very different responses to the genius of place (Doty captured by the particularities; Duncan vaulted into Platonic spheres) and yet with both one senses the ontological pressures and history that "a made place" could permit. Doty's universe is heir to Duncan's magical permissions and dutifully is more expansive in expressing what is possible because more is possible.
that is not mine, but is a made place,
subsumed into the steadying frameAnd we are left at poem's end with the image of two men tending house, sweeping, and waxing floors with rags made from their very "own old T-shirts cut / to squares and once again of use."
of a phrase I love: a building:
both noun and verb, where we live
and what we do: fill it with ourselves
Sound is an antidote to words,It begs reworking as a reversal.
meaning lies. It can be used
to show that they are used and only
exist by their use and are made of it.
Words are an antidote to sound,Meaning rests.
meaning rises. They can be used
to show that it is used and only
exists by its use and is made of them.
Justified right a big lower case letter.See
Next line with "enthusiasm" all in a jumble of jumping letters.
And then "eror" with a missing "r"
Next word split over two lines and in bigger point size to mark its "exageration"
And finally almost lost in the gutter in tiny type justified left is "exile".
As the urbanization of the world gathers speed in the 1870s, what has been a solstice holiday in origin becomes a harvest holiday in realization.We readily accept his extended metaphors for the underground city that works in a metropolis like Montreal
The multidimensional city depends on a subway to serve as its nervous system, and a series of tunnels and walkways to serve as its connective tissue. [...] when people are brought in below ground they are eager to come up above ground. You create a permeable membrane between the underworld and the overworld, all based on foot traffic — on the pedestrian, the walker, who is the city's red blood cell, without whom the city pales and sickens and dies of anemia.We are there with him not only because of the address to a "you" but because we can picture ourselves arriving and walking, after all by this point he has made us believe that hockey is as much a mental as a physical contact sport. Winter is his season. And we are so much the warmer for having shared his experiences and musings.
Be carefulI just so happens that a few days later I came across the passage from Jan Zwicky in Forge towards the end of a sequential poem "Practising Bach" (apologies for not doing the typography justice)
when birds are sleeping:
sometimes they're dreaming the universe
and you in it.
I woke a bird once
but he was from another universe
and I was from another dream
so it all worked out in the end.
This may also be thought of as the problem of metaphor: the metaphor's truth, its charge of meaning, depends on the assertion of identity and difference, on erotic coherence and referential strife, on meaning as resonance and meaning revealed through analysis.The one describes the other. Despite their very varied ways of approaching matter, diction (you know a Kasturi poem from a Zwicky poem like you know apple from orange) and despite the different ways they unravel words and knit worlds — they let us fly and bring us by an abrupt turn to the spot where stopping seems just.
Until the oaf thwacks down the bush,The waters are muddied and the fish and creatures upset. But by poem's end we are expected to imagine the bear missing the catch and that all returns to a previous state and the not previous state.
breaks twigs. He comes
from grubbing worms, will mine
SupposeThis is wry commentary with its wink at the folk song derived from Ecclesiastes. Travis Lane will pick up the motif of disturbed water in many images of mirrors that populate the later poetry. Take for instance the beginning of "Ash Steps"
he mines no dinner, goes again.
Then wait, not long,
all things return
beneath the sun's soft negligence --
all things, all visions, walkers, fish --
and even bears.
No frogFurther on in the collection, one encounters a whole panoply of disturbers and a most intriguing catch and release method to not restore circumstances but to trigger the meditative reflection. "Les Pêcheurs d'eau" ends with a complex figure of exhaustion and renewal:
jumped into the water bin.
But something fell, and for a while
that tepid mirror shifted, squirmed,
and shook beige shreds of floating leaf,
a pigeon feather, dust
larvae perhaps.
For centuries they've caught our music,The ecological scale seems vast and the focus on decline poignant but we recall other instances of disturbed mirrors and earlier in the collection the wisdom of "Practical Meditation".
Poets, moths, flies, frogs, dogs, cats, and lunatics.
Some years an iceberg, snagged, overturns.
So little's left, they have been fishing for so long!
Whatever they catch, they do, at least
they do throw it all back again:
but hooked, unhooked, now maimed.
Epiphanies splash up like waves on windy daysI like how whether it be plethora or scarcity, there is opportunity with and without our ursine cousins. Exeunt pursued by a bear. And the re-citing of the stage direction from a Winter's Tale is in a sense rewritten as our pursuit. Chased and chasing. Firefly flickers. Mined and mine.
against the green edge of a pier;
you don't have to go out to look for them,
abundant, brief, like fireflies as they are.
Plucked of a miragement of video-control systems while others murmured towards her an ill-will. He reproached himself with his devotion to/in any case. The different trees afforded a changing spectacle, however of its time. By roots in Idealist Abstraction, an itinerant astronomer.Obviously this type of writing resists. Resists sense making. Nevertheless, there are micro-moments that provide keys. Consider the hyphenation of "video-control" and "ill-will". A parallel of negative intent. Further on the reader is oriented in/to which is holding a kind of tension with out/from as reading moves on/back. Now, consider the possibility that the changing spectacle is plucked from the condensation of mirage and management: miragement. It's the neologism, "miragement" that slows down the reading and unhitches us from whatever to/in case we might be going round and round. And by association we as readers become itinerant astronomers, voyaging through the stars/constellations of such language tracks. And by our roots we work with mirage produced by the looking at. Murmur produced by murmur. Language resisting language. Mi-rage-ment: partial affordances for the terror of more cutting approaches: m/i/ra/ge/ment. Like a signal system held on pause and reapproaching abstraction. And so we come to quote the last of these stanza/paragraphs.
He found himself offering. The actress had not a minute to spare. Mass assesses itself in a further dissolution. By day, the daily disturbance effects engineering unity in parallel with rhythmic extension as heard in some of the more mathematically restrictive musics, the joy engaged, the caress of the past.In case we are going, we encounter disturbance and music. See La Monte Young
His Compositions 1960 includes a number of unusual actions. Some of them are un-performable, but each deliberatively examines a certain presupposition about the nature of music and art and carries ideas to an extreme. One instructs: "draw a straight line and follow it" (a directive which he has said has guided his life and work since). Another instructs the performer to build a fire. Another states that "this piece is a little whirlpool out in the middle of the ocean." Another says the performer should release a butterfly into the room. Yet another challenges the performer to push a piano through a wall. Composition 1960 #7 proved especially pertinent to his future endeavors: it consisted of a B, an F#, a perfect fifth, and the instruction: "To be held for a long timeWith Trujillo Lusk: murmur and admire result. Repeat. It's like an unending line. It's miragement. It's its.
— who knows what a fact is, solid ground ... versus, say, drip grind in the rain forest ... versus, say, verses.I'm not sure if the ellipses mark out pieces left behind in the selection or if they are part of the piece — I/we would have to check against the published version of The Alphabet. It is so often the case that periodical publication is later revised for the book form...
In order to recognize it name it before you know it.And this as much as it is instruction is also description. It is what we do when we turn. When we compose verses. And whether Bromige's lines appear before or after Silliman's matters little — they are joined by the transversal of language... and its possibilities.
Having begun, stop before you can begin, or lose what you began.
I pour a cup of coffee, steady itfrom "The Letters"
with milk, stir until it turns from
coal to caramel, the steam rising,
Red tits of the sunThere is delicious ambiguity at work here. Is shadow to be separate from the fabrics? Each fabric to be separated from the others? Both of these alternatives combined? Why care so much about washing?
Blue tits of the moon
Part cotton
Part lycra
Part spandex
Part polyester
Part shadow
Wash separately
Words are what sticks to the real. We use them to push the real, to drag the real into the poem. They are what we hold on with, nothing else. They are as valuable in themselves as rope with nothing to be tied to.Spicer's "real" puts added pressure on Morse's "naturally dirty". And Morse's response is set in the context of a dialectic between speech and silence. Here is the paragraph from that letter in which the dirtiness of language comes to the fore (mind the gaps; the periods have been washed out):
I repeat — the perfect poem has an infinitely small vocabulary.
Even if we can't get together, the poem & language go on talking Things are disclosed & revealed in places where nobody is Language outgrows any mens rea, any evidence of intent I didn't mean it really That was language talking We were both a kind of misleading question mark Even those polite requests for reassurance do you love me don't you want to go to bed with me do you love me sound abhorrent beside the altercosm of language which is naturally dirty The very real pause or clause is a threat to shatter that beautiful loneliness so necessary to poetry So we go to bed together without a word while language whispers from dusty aisles & pissy alleyways & sore assesIn the poetics proposed in After Jack one move in dealing with the dirt of language (or rather the dirty altercosm of language) is not segregation but the more nuanced notion of separation. For as the voice in "Sonata for a Chair and a Table" says "Words arrange things. Make" and in the temporality of the poem the pile of laundry remains both a pile and through its closing injunction, sorted — the poem itself and its dominant image inhabit a type of hybridity. Words keep getting stuck by their sticky nature. And Morse helps us come to terms with the dirt by subtle spacing in which a deter agent can cleanse even the most minimal of vocabularies. And make magic from more than a laundry list.
Discussions are a most valuable part of OMEP World Assemblies. For the 1961 VIIIth World Assembly in Zagreb a vocabulary for use in discussions about child development was printed in OMEP News Letter No. 4. National Committees then made suggestions which have been incorporated in this vocabulary for the 1962 IXth World Assembly in London.The front cover illustrated by Gillian, age 7.
No on has to accept any definition given here. But if in discussion another meaning is given to a word, then the different meaning should be defined.
Temper tantrumMais si, dans la discussion, on désire donner à un terme un sens autre que celui du lexique, il y aura lieu de le préciser.
Self-discipline
Rêverie
Daydreaming
Auto-discipline
Accèss de colère
A nonmaterial definition of the book comes hand in hand, it seems to me, with a nonmaterial definition of reading. In the widest sense, I think the term simply means paying attention to what's in front of you and trying to make sense of it. Fish do this as they swim through the water. Birds do it as they fly through the air or sit in the trees or on lamp posts waiting for breakfast. Earthworms do it as they poke through the sod, and I do it, not only in the library but also when I'm listening to those birds or looking at the water and thinking about those fish. This foundational kind of reading is much older than the oldest protoliterate inscriptions, older than human language, older than the first, nameless primates, climbing around in the trees of northern Africa some sixty million years ago.And so the earthworms continue to produce casings just as they did eons before I or any of my ancestors learned to read. But we are relatives, "Earthworms ... and I..." and it is a profound type of kinship.
from Robert Bringhurst What is Reading for? (RIT Cary Graphic Arts Press, 2011)
dry as dream-waterfrom Lyn King Walking into the Night Sky whose poems are paced very much like pulses she places in the figure of the travelogue body and its metaphorical comings and goings. One is tempted to uncrease, to rewind, and travel backwards.
Its last sound folds
into the origami air
Home hooks in our ribs
and hurts when we breathe
Home hooks in our ribsThe poems appear to have a sequence and then when read in reverse order seem to call again to the reader to the moment poised when a universe opens up from a slight stem of words. She has captivated us from the italicized proem which both invokes and describes: "Awake, what unfolds from earth / brown veins bleeding green is / called a tree". And many of the poems offer a migration as transformation and in most one finds some dendrological dream matter to condense into our own transmutations and to adopt via metaphor a peculiar way of seeing and sensing the world and words. Like leaves set free.
and hurts when we breathe
Its last sound folds
into the origami air
dry as dream-water
When Rabbi Levi Yitsak came to Nikolsburg to visit Rabbi Shmelke who had taught him the way of fervor when he was young, and whom he had not seen in a long time, he went into the kitchen, covered with his prayer shawl and with double phylacteries on his forehead, and asked Rabbi Shmelke's wife -- on this very first morning -- what dishes were being prepared for the noonday meal. His question, though rather surprising, was answered. Then he went on to ask whether the cooks had really mastered their art, and other things of the same sort. Rabi Shmelke's disciples, who heard of this, took him for a veritable glutton. He, however, now entered the House of Prayer and -- while the congregation prayed -- began to talk to an utterly insignificant man, despised by all, on quite unimportant worldly subjects, as those standing near could determine. One of the disciples could not bear to observe such behavior any longer and said roughly to the stranger: "Silence! Idle chatter is forbidden here!" But the rabbi of Berditchev paid no attention to him and continued his conversation.Being neither devout nor agnostic, I still find this story enlightening. It shows a path of being present in the delivery of words and equally attentive in the hearing.
At the midday meal, Rabbi Shmelke greeted him joyfully, bade him sit at his side, and ate from the same bowl as he. His disciples, who had heard of the curious manners of the visitor, marked these signs of favor and friendship with sullen surprise. When the meal was over, one of them could no longer suppress his annoyance and asked his master why he showered honors on so empty-headed and impudent a man who had behaved in such and such a way. The zaddik replied: "In the Gemara we read: 'Rab (Abba Areka), for all the days of his life never spoke of worldly matters.' Is this praise not strange? Does it indicate that the other masters spent their time in wordly talk? Can nothing worthier be told of Rab? The meaning is this: Whatever worldly affairs he discussed with people in the course of the day, each of his words was, in reality, filled with secret significance and a secret purpose, and made itself felt in the higher world; and his spirit remained steadfast in such service all day long. That is why our sages have accorded him praise of which none other was found worthy. what others could do for only three hours, after which they sank from this level, he could do throughout the day. And the same is true of Rabbi Levi Yitzak. what I can do for only three hours, he can do the whole day through: concentrate his spirit, so that it makes itself felt in the world of Heaven, even with talk which men consider idle."
Again. Writing is an aid to forgetting.from Alan Davies This Is Thinking
For those of us fastidious about words writing is
a way of getting some of them out of the head in
order to make way for new experiences.
Without writing we'd hold on to words at the
expense of those experiences which happily (at
times) give rise to them.
Writing is letting go.
To write is to let go.
Writing is a way of getting younger.
(It's a way of getting younger so that we can
age.
Gracefully.
Gracelessly.
Or otherwise.)
Dear Friend,I am still intrigued as to how far one can push the world-state mapping.
Very last day of the month: time to sneak in under the wire a report some disjecta and let you know that I have continued to meditate on the theme of experience and expression.
First, the hyacinth is blooming and the smell of the six or so plants in the garden is heady. It is a temporary phenomenon all the richer because of its transiance.
Second, I found myself considering what I am inclined to call the forgetting of narration. I have observed in some examples of critical discourse that there is a tendency to speak in terms of many narrations and a single narrative. If a phenomenological perspective is introduced then narrative is not seen as a single and unique object of thought (or experience) but as the product of agreement between subjects. The diagram of a diegesis is no less a narration than the many words or images that also give access to similar constructions.
It is by agreement that we produce the same story, an agreement renegotiated at every telling.
The same story is always a new agreement. Recall children wanting to hear a favourite story with all the noises and gestures that produce the sense of the familiar. It is a language trap to insist that what returns is the same. It is familiar.
No two cups of tea taste the same yet they are recognized as cups of tea and even tea of the same flavour (but with a wee difference in the intensity due to slight shifts in steeping time).
I have been propelled to this nominalist realization of the instability of any given entity called a "narrative" by recalling a question that Professor Fitch asked at my defence so very many years ago. His question was about Ingarden's notion of concretization. My answer then makes more sense now: a rereading produces a different concretization. Of course some readers would set concretization on the side of narration and a narrative on the side of some unchanging structure. But the structure itself is malleable. Its stability, a function of our agreements.
In Saussure's Cours there is an illustration (referenced by Barthes in Elements of Semiology) where there are two flows and samplings from each. Below is a typographic transcription
===== < ==== > =====
.......... < .......... > ........
The famous aribitrariness of the sign is a relation between samplings. The signified is as much an incision into a flow of matter as is the signifier. All this seems rather obvious to anyone that understands the semantic field to be dynamic. If the pair narration/narrative is isomorphic with the pair signifier/signified, the slippage that is perceived in expression/experience is built in to how humans process the relations between language and reality.
And language is a part of reality.
Third of the disjecta, all these musings on the intersubjectivie nature of the stability of narrative as object of thought or experience came after a lecture by Martin Lefebvre to the Toronto Semiotic Circle where he quoted Peirce to the effect that "every fine argument is a poem or a symphony" and outlined a scheme where habit mediates between chance/origin and necessity/telos. This is getting long and convoluted. The following is very sketchy.
involution is not equivalent to self-reflexivity
involution produces a copy of the world in a given state which becomes the base state to compare subsequent states [This is similar to how a computer’s central processing unit keeps a copy in active memory to work upon -- the model can be applied to the act of reading. In my thesis way back when I briefly touched upon the notion of involution in a quick look at the similarities between the semiotic square and the mathematical object called a Klein group. This in the context of positing the semiotic square as a machine...]
Someone somewhere may have already introduced the notion of states into possible world semantics. This might just give access to a poetics of impossible worlds. Impossible worlds are games (considered as moves between states). A focus that might interest those in searching to bridge the ludology versus narratology in gaming studies.
Of course I’m left with questions to ponder: How does, if it does, the pair world-state map onto the pair narrative-narration?
And so I take time to breathe and smell the fleeting hyacinth.
30.04.07
Every night the monument turned into a ritual by entering my body. I consumed his distinctions where before I had seen none, just an unknown expanse of bright utopian images to appeal to the stranger passing the frozen food compartment. To make wild assertions: to say I prefer Stouffer's Pizza Chips to Birdseye's Pizza Wraps. To eat Mac's food which was anyone's food — a generic confrontation with salt, oil, too sweet, pumped up with flavor, empty and exciting, a little sensational. I was not anguished. Perhaps I ate his food with greater awareness of the moment, a curiosity that floated on the moment, an expectation that deepened the silence (I say silence although the TV was on, was on, was on). In that way I mourned for Mac.This is a tour de force mixing the commercialism of brand names with personal anecdote. It could be anyone. Everyone. Yet it is no one. They are gone.
Anthony Storr, in Music and the Mind, talks about the close link between hearing and emotions. He points out that hearing is much more closely related to emotions than vision is. If we see a wounded animal or person, he says, we are never as moved as we are if we hear the animal or person's anguished screams with our ears. He theorizes that the strong link between hearing and feeling may be related to the fact that we can hear before we can see, as the sense of hearing is developed in the womb early, before the sense of vision is formed.Next, a couple of questions for multimedia students:
from Beverly Biderman, Wired for Sound (Toronto: Trifolium Books, 1998), pp. 25-26.
Dr. ClaraI like the ambiguity of reference - she backs away. Angeline? or Clara? Context would in a realist reading ascribe the action to Clara. But the "idea of us" complicates theatrical realism. "Us" could refer to one family unit (husband and children), another (the two sisters) or both. In all cases a certain solidarity is tested.
I'm finally going to ask him for a divorce.
Angeline
I'm sorry ...
She backs away slightly and looks at her children.
Dr. Clara
It's time ... we haven't lived together in years ...
Angeline
You still love him? ... Or just the idea of him?
She looks at Angenline
Dr Clara
Maybe I still love the idea of us.
Pause. They both look out into the darkness.
Viscous boy gossip, so demure so classy.From Jessica Grim "Is The Body Talking Sense Now?" in Writing 25 (1990).
Viscous gossip boysAnd so for day 993